Accounts Receivable Management of Midea Group: An Empirical Analysis Based on Financial Ratios and Aging Structure

Authors

  • Jiayi Yang Beijing City University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71204/c9qa5t42

Keywords:

Receivable Management, Financial Analysis, Bad Debt, Credit Policy, Accounts Receivable Turnover, Aging Analysis

Abstract

This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of accounts receivable management at Midea Group from 2019 to 2023. Utilizing financial ratio analysis, comparative benchmarking with industry peers (Xiaomi Group and Gree Electric), and aging structure assessment, the research identifies significant challenges in the company’s receivables management. Key findings indicate a continuous expansion in accounts receivable balance, with growth rates frequently exceeding operating revenue growth. The proportion of receivables to operating revenue and current assets remains elevated relative to industry averages, signaling potential liquidity constraints and heightened capital occupation. Furthermore, the accounts receivable turnover rate is comparatively low, and the aging profile demonstrates a rising trend in longer-term receivables, accompanied by an increasing bad debt provision. These issues are attributed to factors including overreliance on credit sales for market expansion, lenient credit policies, inadequate internal controls, and customer credit risks. To address these challenges, the study proposes targeted recommendations such as strengthening customer credit evaluation, optimizing credit policies, enhancing collection mechanisms, improving internal management processes, and employing financial instruments for risk mitigation. Implementing these measures can enhance accounts receivable liquidity, reduce bad debt risks, and bolster the overall financial health of Midea Group, while offering insights for similar manufacturing enterprises.

References

Anderson, S., & Martin, G. (2022). Industry Peer Effects on Corporate Financial Policies. Financial Management, 51(1), 155-183.

Brown, L., & Davis, R. (2019). Credit Risk Assessment in Manufacturing Firms: A Quantitative Approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(3), 45-58.

Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). The Role of FinTech in Accounts Receivable Securitization. Journal of Financial Innovation, 5(1), 78-95.

Garcia, M., & Lee, K. (2021).The Impact of Accounts Receivable Turnover on Firm Profitability. Global Finance Journal, 49, 100546.

Miller, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). The Effect of Macroeconomic Cycles on Corporate Credit Policy. Economic Modelling, 95, 408-420.

O'Neil, B., & Harris, D. (2017). A Comprehensive Framework for Customer Credit Evaluation. Credit and Financial Management Review, 23(2), 22-35.

Roberts, S. (2019). Internal Control Weaknesses and Accounts Receivable Management. The Accounting Review, 94(5), 341-365.

Smith, J., & Johnson, P. (2020). Accounts Receivable Management: Theory and Practice. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45(2), 112-125.

Thompson, F., & White, A. (2020). The Determinants of Bad Debt Expenses in Large Corporations. Accounting Horizons, 34(4), 89-104.

Wilson, H., & Clark, T. (2018). Working Capital Management and Corporate Liquidity: An Empirical Study .Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 1-12.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

Accounts Receivable Management of Midea Group: An Empirical Analysis Based on Financial Ratios and Aging Structure. (2025). Financial Strategy and Management Reviews, 1(2), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.71204/c9qa5t42

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.